Race Discrimination and
National Origin
Discrimination
Federal and state law and
local ordinances
forbid employers from making
decisions regarding hiring,
promotion, demotion,
termination, compensation,
job training, or other terms
and conditions of employment
based on the employee’s race
or national origin.
It is also
illegal for employers to
create a hostile environment
based on race and/or
national origin. Racial or
ethnic slurs, jokes,
insults, graffiti or other
comments or conduct based on
an employee’s race, color,
or national origin
constitute unlawful
harassment.
The Supreme Court has
defined race broadly to
include identifiable classes
of persons who are subjected
to intentional
discrimination solely
because of their ancestry or
ethnic characteristics.
Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964:
The Act
prohibits discrimination on
the basis of race, color and
national origin.
Section 1981 of the
Civil Rights Act of 1866:
The Act prohibits race
discrimination in
employment. § 1981
applies to discrimination
against groups of any race,
such as African Americans,
Latinos, Asians, Arabs, and
Caucasians.
While Title VII and Section
1981 overlap, there are some
important differences. An
employment lawyer can
explain how these laws apply
to your situation.
Representative Cases
A large percentage of our
cases involve race and
national origin
discrimination, harassment,
and retaliation for
complaining about
discrimination.
Generally, privacy concerns
and confidentiality provisions in settlement
agreements prohibit us from
identifying cases, named
parties, and the existence
and terms of settlement
agreements.
What follows are a few
examples of cases we have
litigated and/or negotiated
to a favorable resolution.
Failure to Promote:
U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Seventh Circuit. Action
filed against the State of
California Board of
Equalization alleging
national origin
discrimination based on
failure to promote. At
trial, the jury found that
the employer failed to
promote our client, an
auditor, because of his
national origin
(Pakistani). The appeals
court upheld the jury
verdict. Appellate decision
reported at 200 F.3d 1035
(7th Cir. 2000).
Action filed against a
global communications
corporation alleging race
discrimination and
retaliation. Our client, a
high performing Pakistani
employee, alleged that the
employer repeatedly passed
over him for promotions in
favor of his less qualified
Caucasian and American-born
peers and that after he
complained of
discrimination, the employer
retaliated by giving him
unwarranted write-ups,
lowering his overall
performance rating and
attempting to solicit
criticism about him from his
co-workers. No. 05 C 0838,
U.S. District Court,
Northern District of
Illinois.
Employer, a large national
retail store, had a pattern
and practice of selecting
Caucasian employees for
managerial positions without
first posting the positions,
and hiring a few token
minorities for less
prestigious managerial
positions (security and
stock room). Our clients,
an African American and a
Hispanic, were passed over
for managerial positions
despite their high
performance ratings, in
favor of less qualified
Caucasians.
Race Discrimination and
Retaliation:
Action filed against a
nursing home facility
alleging retaliation. The
employer accused our client
of performance problems and
terminated her after she
complained of race
discrimination. No. 03 C
1186, U.S. District Court,
Northern District of
Illinois.
Action filed against a bank
alleging discrimination and
retaliation. Our client, an
African American assistant
vice president, complained
of race discrimination after
she was passed over for a
promotion. After she
complained, the employer
took away her managerial
responsibilities. The court
denied the employer’s motion
for summary judgment on the
retaliation claim. No. 01 C
2290, U.S. District Court,
Northern District of
Illinois.
Action filed alleging race
discrimination and
retaliation. Employer
terminated our client
immediately after she
notified her employer of
intent to file EEOC charge.
No. 00C 3023 U.S. District
Court, Northern District of
Illinois.
Different Terms and
Conditions of Employment:
An automobile services
employer subjected its
African-American employees
to different terms and
conditions of employment by
monitoring their attendance
more closely, holding them
to higher standards, and
disciplining them more
harshly. A Caucasian
manager made racially
offensive jokes and
comments. After our client
complained of race
discrimination, the employer
terminated her.
Hostile Environment:
A Caucasian manager
subjected our client to a
hostile environment by
calling her “sista” after
she repeatedly asked to be
called by her given name;
making comments and jokes
about her race and skin
color; and chiding her for
not being knowledgeable
about Kwanzaa.
If you have concerns about
race or national origin
discrimination, feel free to
contact us. |